Overall I'm quite into the idea of keeping wildernesses wild. I'm not at all into the idea of seeing the Snow Leopard becoming extinct and I am quite a keen gardener and as such have been composting for years.

The single biggest tragedy of this entire climate nonsense agenda is that, as a movement for a cleaner world, the environmentalists have done much more damage to the planet than the majority of the population who just want to live their lives in peace.


Climate change is absolutely real, it has always been so. And even the effects mankind has on the overal climate are real. Of course it will have an affect if we build a dam, divert a river, empty a basin, chop down a forest. So what?! The Western world, or the developed world are having a more positive relationship with the local envirnonment than any branch of humanity have had for over a thousand years. To try and claim that modern humans are a negative effect on the climate of this planet is nothing more than short sighted hubris.

It's no surprise that the laymen who are most obsessed with the concept of AGW are always lefties. They've been seeking a way to dominate politics for over a hundred years and those pesky voters have never, ever given them that much authority. So they are now seeking to take that authority.

The scientists involved in this need to take a deep breath and decide if they are scientists or politically inspired advocates. For James Hansen there's no way back. He is a politically motivated advocate now. Mann, Jones, Trenberth and Briffa probably all are too, as are many more.

A policeman said a funny thing to me after Climategate. He said that his interviews with the UEA staff told him that the were true believers and he couldn't tie that together with the fact that they obsessively protected 'their' data.

Like the temperature in China actually belonged to them,